Six new research projects tackling self-harm and suicide
A look at the latest research we’re supporting on suicide and self-harm, exploring how we can more effectively protect and support those at risk.
Using her lived experience of mental health conditions to help shape future research
Jo is a lived experience expert who helped shape our decisions about which suicide and self-harm research fellowships to fund.
Here, she reflects on what made the experience meaningful, and why she describes it as the “gold standard” for involving lived experience in research.
Lived experience experts are people who bring direct, personal experience of a health condition, illness, disability, or related circumstance (or of caring for someone who does), that is relevant to the research.
Between October 2025 and March 2026, the Medical Research Foundation partnered with Vocal Collective CIC to bring lived experience experts (LEEs) and public engagement and involvement practitioners (PEPs) into grant review and funding decisions.
The pilot ran across two of our funding calls - on suicide and self-harm research, and research looking at the impact of cancer and cancer treatment on human biology.
Jo was part of the panel of lived experience experts involved in the decision making for the suicide and self-harm funding call.
From the very beginning, it felt clear that this was a process built with care
"Taking part in this project with Vocal Collective and the Medical Research Foundation has been one of the most meaningful and positive experiences I’ve had in public involvement.
From the very beginning, it felt clear that this was a process built with care. The information we were given, especially the lived experience guide, was clear, detailed, and easy to follow. It explained not just what we would be doing, but how we would be supported along the way. That made a real difference, particularly given the sensitive nature of the topic.
I brought my own perspective, while also learning from and listening to the experiences shared by others. What stood out throughout was how much value was placed on people working together and learning from each other."
The whole process felt fair, balanced, and genuinely collaborative
"The way the process was designed worked really well. It wasn’t rushed or unclear, it was broken down into clear steps. We were given time to read and reflect on research applications and then come together in small groups to talk things through. These discussions were an important part of the process. They allowed us to share different viewpoints, notice common themes, and raise concerns in a supportive space.
Importantly, those conversations didn’t just stay in the room. They were carefully written up and carried forward into the next stage. This meant that when decisions were being made about which research projects should move forward, known as shortlisting, they were informed by a shared understanding, not just individual opinions.
That structure made the whole process feel fair, balanced, and genuinely collaborative. It also meant that no one was expected to carry everything on their own."
We were encouraged to take breaks, step out if needed, and look after ourselves
"Another thing that stood out was the level of support throughout. The team were always approachable, and it was easy to ask questions or check things if needed. There was also a strong focus on wellbeing. We were encouraged to take breaks, step out if needed, and look after ourselves. The mindfulness sessions were especially helpful, giving space to pause and reset.
People were also supported to step out if needed, which created a sense of trust and made it easier to take part in a way that felt manageable. At times there was a lot to take in, but the structure and support in place made it manageable. When things weren’t clear, they were explained in a supportive and approachable way, which helped build confidence."
My role was an important one, which involved asking the applicants questions alongside academic panel members across the two days
"Reaching the interview stage at the Medical Research Foundation was a real highlight. The team arranged travel and accommodation, which removed a lot of practical pressure and allowed me to focus fully on the experience.
The interviews took place over two days, and the way they were run was very well organised. Each interview was structured, respectful, and gave space for different perspectives to be heard. As part of the panel, I felt supported to contribute and confident in raising points from a lived experience perspective. The Chair was fantastic and I felt fully part of the team. My role was an important one, which involved asking the applicants questions alongside academic panel members across the two days. This was shared with another public contributor, which worked really well.
What stood out most was how inclusive the environment felt. There was a strong sense of teamwork across the panel, and I felt that everyone’s input was valued. I never felt rushed or overlooked: there was space to think, reflect, and speak when needed.
Being physically in the room made a real difference. It helped build connection, made conversations feel more natural, and gave a stronger sense of being part of the panel. It also made it easier to contribute and feel fully involved in the discussion.
Although the topic itself is difficult and sensitive, the way the interviews were handled made it possible to engage in a thoughtful and constructive way. By this stage, because of the preparation and support throughout the process, I felt fully immersed and confident in my role.
I also felt very welcomed by the Medical Research Foundation team. They were professional but also approachable and down to earth, which helped create a comfortable atmosphere. Even the Director took the time to come and speak with me, which meant a great deal and made me feel genuinely valued."
Six new projects tackling self-harm and suicide in young people, funded with the involvement of lived experience experts in the decision-making
Read moreThis was not a tick-box exercise
"What I take away most from this experience is how powerful it can be when people are genuinely included and supported. This was not a tick-box exercise. It was a carefully designed process where different perspectives were brought together and used to inform real decisions.
This public involvement work has been a fantastic experience. The level of guidance, the thought that had gone into each stage, and the way people were supported throughout has been gold standard."
"If other research funders want to involve lived experience in a meaningful way, my advice would be simple.
The banner image in this article was created with generative AI tools.